Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology ; 66(Supplement 1):150, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2136565

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Cancer management is time sensitive with documented increased mortality with delays from diagnosis to treatment (1-4). National and international 'optimal care paths' and Cancer plans have been established to ensure patient centric, standardised approaches to cancer care based on best available evidence (5-7). Australian, Victorian Cancer Council-Optimal Care Pathways is a nationally endorsed guideline (5). However, there are limited publications assessing actual performance of cancer services against set guidelines (8). There are known barriers to achieving optimal cancer care with these likely amplified by the COVID19 pandemic (9-10), with these delays impacting on disease control, quality of life and significant economic costs (11-14). We aimed to assess performance against optimal care path guidelines and the potential impact of the COVID19 pandemic on achieving this ideal. Methods and Materials: Patients undergoing curative treatment with radiotherapy in Head and Neck (HN), Breast, Lung and Gastrointestinal malignancies between 2019-2021 in a single institution were included. Performance against the Victorian Cancer Council Guidelines for commencement of Radiotherapy in the definitive and neo/ adjuvant settings were analysed using the one sample t-test. The impact of COVID19 was analysed using a Mann Whitney U Test. Result(s): 733 patients between 2019-2021 were included in the retrospective analysis. Guidelines were only met by 65% breast (p = 0.2606), 35% HN-adjuvant (p =0.0000), 37% HN-definitive (p=0.6059), 74% Lung (p=0.3725), 4% oesophagus (p = 0.0002) and 33% rectal (p=0.0022) cancer patients. Percentage of patients exceeding guidelines by more than half the recommended time was 4% breast, 27% HN-adjuvant, 19% HN-definitive, 10% Lung, 76% oesophagus and 50% rectal cancer patients. There was no detrimental impact of COVID19 on guideline compliance between all tumour sites (p<0.05). Conclusion(s): This limited retrospective study highlights the persistent challenges in achieving optimal cancer care pathways designed to ensure quality care and best possible outcomes for patients. Further investigation will be done to identify the compliance across the comprehensive multi-disciplinary care path, barriers to achieving the optimal and potential solutions at a local level. However, a national strategy is required in strengthening the evidence base for the care paths, identifying the actual compliance of Cancer Services with defined 'optimal' guidelines, the barriers to achieving these and the potential qualitative/quantitative impact of not achieving 'optimal guidelines' on patients, society and the health care systems.

2.
Networks and Heterogeneous Media ; 0(0):24, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1798842

ABSTRACT

During the Covid-19 pandemic a key role is played by vaccination to combat the virus. There are many possible policies for prioritizing vaccines, and different criteria for optimization: minimize death, time to herd immunity, functioning of the health system. Using an age-structured population compartmental finite-dimensional optimal control model, our results suggest that the eldest to youngest vaccination policy is optimal to minimize deaths. Our model includes the possible infection of vaccinated populations. We apply our model to real-life data from the US Census for New Jersey and Florida, which have a significantly different population structure. We also provide various estimates of the number of lives saved by optimizing the vaccine schedule and compared to no vaccination.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL